( 2026:JHHC:29163 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5396 of 2026 ------ 1. Chotelal Oraon, age 19 years, S/o Basant Oraon, 2. Dharmendra Oraon, age 28 years, S/o Basant Oraon 3. Sakendra Oraon, age 33 years, S/o Basant Oraon 4. Dhrudeo Oraon @ Drupdeo, age 22 years, S/o Basant Oraon 5. Joseph Oraon @ Joseph Tirky, age 18 years, S/o Basant Oraon, all are residents of Village –Chiyanki Mahadev Mara, P.O. –Chiyanki, P.S. –Daltonganj Sadar, District – Palamau, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28.09.2026 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Daltonganj Sadar P.S. Case No.81 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2)/127(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109(1)/352/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons assaulted the informant on his leg causing simple injury. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that leg is not a vital part of the body and admittedly the petitioners are the brothers of the informant and dispute between them is regarding partition of the joint family property. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-13 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that in para -6 of the rejection order of the anticipatory bail, it has categorically been mentioned that the injury report shows that the injury sustained by the victim are simple in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above-named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Palamau, in connection with Daltonganj Sadar P.S. Case No.81 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28.09.2026 Sonu/