Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010708202025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 36695/2025 Between:
1. SRI KANDULA JAYA BABU, S/O, LATE UMA MAHESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, D. NO. 3/365, ABBAS PANJA ROAD MACHILIPATNAM,KRISHNA DISTRICT.-52100
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522237
2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521001
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM DIVISION KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521001
4. THE TAHSILDAR, MACHILIPATNAM DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521001
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 in not disposing the representation made by the petitioner on 11.08.2025 for the release of seized stocks in respect of the 19 quintals Rice bags (3850) 50
VS,J W.P No.36695 of 2025 2
kgs each, total 38 rice bags valued at 81700- as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the express provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and consequently, direct the respondent no. 2 to release the seized stocks by furnishing the 3rd parties security and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to release the seized stocks by furnishing the 3rd parties security and grant Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
VS,J W.P No.36695 of 2025 3
The Court made the following Order: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“….to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no.2 in not disposing the representation made by the petitioner on 11.08.2025 for the release of seized stocks in respect of the 19 quintals Rice bags (38*50) 50 kgs each, total 38 rice bags valued at 81700/- as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the express provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and consequently, direct the respondent no.2 to release the seized stocks by furnishing the 3rd parties security and pass such other and further orders…”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for respondents. 3. Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated the contentions raised in the Writ Petition, but, however limited his request to direct the respondent authorities to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 11.08.2025, seeking release of the seized stock i.e., 19 quintals of rice (38 bags x 50 kgs each) total valued at Rs.81,700/-. 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondent authorities submits that the respondent authorities will consider the representation submitted by the petitioner, dated
VS,J W.P No.36695 of 2025 4
11.08.2025 and will pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, if not yet
disposed of.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and
submissions made by the learned counsels, instead of going into the merits of the case, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 11.08.2025 for release of the seized stock, upon the petitioner furnishing immovable property security equivalent to the value of the seized stock, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order.
6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:05.01.2026 KGR