Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27760 (CAL)

AINUL HAQUE v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

MAT/690/2026 · 2026-07-14

Ajay Kumar Gupta, Shampa Sarkar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.07.2026 ADSL No.1 Court No.12 (gc) MAT 690 of 2026 Ainul Hoque VS The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Rita Patra, Adv. .… for the Appellant. Mr. Suman Banerjee, Adv. …for the Writ Petitioner/ Respondent. 1. The matter was mentioned at 4 pm for correction of the name of the appellant and his father, in the appeal papers and the judgment/orders passed by us. We delivered the judgment in the morning by pronouncement in an open court. Thus, supplementary list was prepared and notified. 2. Leave is granted to the Advocate on record to correct the name of the appellant and the name of the father of the appellant in the memorandum of appeal and the connected applications. 3. Consequently, the name of the appellant shall stand corrected as “Ainul Hoque” instead of “Ainul Haque” in all the orders passed in the appeal from time to time and also in the judgment delivered today. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)