1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 63 of 2026 Date of decision: 09.03.2026 Dharam Pal ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks implementation of the judgment rendered in Dharam Pal Versus State of H.P. and others.1 The said judgment was passed on the basis of another decision rendered in Satya Devi Versus State of H.P. and others2. 2. It is a matter of the record that the aforesaid decision in Satya Devi’s3 case has been stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide interim order dated 24.03.2025 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.11306/2025 (State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal). 1 CWP No.1117/2025 decided on 14.01.2025 2 CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 28.05.2024 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 3. In view of above, the present petition to stand disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy at an appropriate stage in case necessity so presents itself in future. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 09th March, 2026 Judge (rohit)