MADHAB DE @ MADHAB CHANDRA DEY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/1188/2026 · 2026-07-14
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27738 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27738 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14.07.2026
Sl. No. DL 476 Court No. 35
ALLOWED
Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Case No.
CRM (M) 1188 of 2026
In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Bhatar Police Station case no.51 of 2026 dated 29.01.2026 under Sections 80(2), 316(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. -AND- In the matter of :
MADHAB DE @ MADHAB CHANDRA DEY ……Petitioner For the Petitioner : Mr. Sujoy Sarkar …Advocate For the State : Mr. Sagar Saha Mr. Amol Kumar Datta …Advocate
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 127 days and chargesheet has already been submitted. 2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail. 3. I have taken into account the post mortem report. Having regard to the facts of the case and the fact that the trial would take some time to be taken to its logical conclusion, I am of the view that further custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Page 2
4. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 5. As such, the petitioner, namely, Madhab De @ Madhab Chandra Dey shall furnish bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Bardhaman. 6. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court in seisin of the case. The petitioner shall not leave the district of Purba Bardhaman without prior permission of the concerned Court. 7. With the above observations, CRM(M) 1188 of 2026 is disposed of. 8. Memo of evidence filed by the State be kept with the record. 9. Case diary be returned to the learned advocate appearing for the State. 10. All parties shall act on the basis of server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )