Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2773 (RAJ)

NATHU LAL S/O GIRDHARI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3768/2026 · 2026-02-27

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9212] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3768/2026 Nathu Lal S/o Girdhari, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Nanagwas, Raipur, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Sikar. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Neemkathana, District Sikar. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar. 5. The Gram Panchayat Dariba, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Through Its Village Development Officer. 6. Banshidhar S/o Mangnaram Gurjar, R/o Village Nanagwas, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 7. Devkaran S/o Mangnaram Gurjar, R/o Village Nanagwas, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 27/02/2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow the writ petition and by an appropriate writ of mandamus, order or direction in nature thereof: I) The respondent No.1 to 5 may kindly be directed to initiate immediate action to remove encroachment from [2026:RJ-JP:9212] (2 of 3) [CW-3768/2026] pasture land being Khasra No. 30 and 59 measuring 0.66 hectare, situated at Village Nanagwas, Patwar Halka Dariba, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar, which is illegally encroached and trespassed by the respondent No.6 & 7 at the backdropped of leading judgment Division Bench of this Hon’ble High Court delivered in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. (Supra) ii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioners along with cost of writ petition. ” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present matter, the petitioner has submitted a several representations, however, no heed was paid to the said representations by the authorities. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the [2026:RJ-JP:9212] (3 of 3) [CW-3768/2026] petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /10