SMT. MANJULA v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED
WP/4724/2021 · 2026-07-07
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27720 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27720 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34855 WP No. 4724 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 4724 OF 2021 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. MANJULA W/O LATE M.R.SHEKAR, AGD ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT VASUDEV REDDY LAYOUT, NEAR AMAR JYOTHI SCHOOL, MULABAGAL, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 131. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOVINDARAJ K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED HEAD OFFICE, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
REP. BY IS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2.
DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES) CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
3.
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER O AND M CIRCLE, BESCOM, KOLAR.
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34855 WP No. 4724 of 2021
4.
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (COMMERCIAL EXECUTIVE AND IMPLEMENTATION DIVISION) CAMPAIGN REEFS, KGF, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 117. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 & R4 SRI. VIKRAM UNNI RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 09.02.2021 ISSUED BY R-3 VIDE ANNX-V, DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO APPOINT THE PETITIONER IN A SUITABLE POST ON COMPASSIONATE GROUNDS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 filed a memo for dismissal of the writ petition alleging that, during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was appointed to the post of Assistant vide Annexure-R1. In view of the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34855 WP No. 4724 of 2021
same, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition, and the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
4. Pending IA(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS