1 CGHC010258542018 2026:CGHC:30992 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5860 of 2018 * - Shekh Fharookh S/o Late Kallu Khan @ Shekh Purid Aged About 31 Years R/o Yadunandgan Nagar, Q.No. D-11 Tifra Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Present R/o Jeenat Vihar Face -1 Quarter No. 37 Ganesh Nagar Chuchihiyapara, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Office Of Executive Engineer Nagar Sambhag-2 (West) Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Through Superintendent Engineer, Tifra Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Noshba Bee W/o Late Kallu Khan @ Shekh Farid Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Bhedimuda Ratanpur, P.S. Ratanpur, Tah. Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattigarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Farida Begam D/o Late Kallu @ Shekh Farid Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Bhedimuda Ratanpur, P.S. Ratanpur, Tah. Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattigarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Ku. Farizana Begam D/o Late Lat Kallu @ Shekh Farid Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Bhedimuda Ratanpur, P.S. Ratanpur, Tah. Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattigarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shekh Nizam S/o Late Kallu Khan @ Shekh Farid Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Bhedimuda Ratanpur, P.S. Ratanpur, Tah. Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattigarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Anushree Mishra, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondents No. 3 to 6 : : Mr. Brajendra Singh, Advocate Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.07.21 18:49:49 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21/07/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased call for the entire records pertaining to this case from possession of the respondents for it’s kind perusal. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of mandamus or suitable direction commanding the respondents about the appointment of the petitioner on Compassionate basis in their office as the post of class 3 or class 4. If respondent disqualified the petitioner for the post of class 3 or class 4. Then other benefit option as per the rule of the respondents may be given to the petitioner. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the claim of the petitioner with regard to grant of compassionate appointment was rejected by the respondent authorities vide order date 25.07.2018 (Annexure P-1), but the very order has not been challenged in this petition. At this stage, she seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file better petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti