Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27720 (AP)

Burra Parandamaiah v. Burra Bhupathi

CRP/6646/2018 · 2026-03-29

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010709542018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6646/2018 Between: 1. BURRA PARANDAMAIAH,, S/O LATE RUSHYENDRA MANDADI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. CHITTOOR ...PETITIONER AND 1. BURRA BHUPATHI, S/O DASARI MANDADI, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. CHITTOOR 2. BURRA GAJENDRA, S/O GANGADHARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. BURRA MOGILAIAH, S/O GANGADHARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. BURRA PURUSHOTTAM, S/O GANGADHARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. BURRA GANESH, S/O GANGADHARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, 2 BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. BURRA REVATHAMUNI, S/O GANGADHARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIS 7. BURRA GANGADHARAM, S/O SADARI MANDADI, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DEGALABANDA VILLAGE, KATAPPAGARIPALLE POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Hon'ble Court against the Order dated 08- 08-2018 passed in I.A.No.206 of 2018 in O.S.No.26 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor District for the following IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in OS NO.26 of 2014 on the file of the court of VIII Additional district judge, Chittoor, Chittoor district, pending disposal of CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6646 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Muni Reddy Bala Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri P.Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 30.03.2026 PSA