Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27709 (CAL)

RAJKUMAR KARMAKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2859/2025 · 2026-07-10

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.28. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 2859 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kushmandi Police Station case no. 207 of 2024 dated 01.11.2024 under Sections 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Rajkumar Karmakar ……Petitioner. Mr. Mazhar Hossain Chowdhury .....for the Petitioner. Ms. Sumi Gupta ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for one year eight months, charge-sheet has already been submitted, charge has been framed and witness action has commenced. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and refers to the post-mortem report along with the statement of one of the witness under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have taken into account the foundational facts of the case which reflects that two persons were intoxicated after consuming alcohol and one of their son assaulted both of them, out of which one succumbed to the injuries. Having considered the genesis of the present case and that there are no criminal antecedents of the present petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 2 As such, the petitioner, namely, Rajkumar Karmakar shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangarampur at Buniadpur, Dakshin Dinajpur. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Dakshin Dinajpur without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Thus, CRM (M) No. 2859 of 2025 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)