Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27707 (KAR)

M/S KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY v. SRI DINESH SHETTY K

WP/20567/2026 · 2026-07-07

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34258 WP No. 20567 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 20567 OF 2026 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: M/S. KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, NO.1000, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 2ND 'C' CROSS, BASAVESHWARA NAGARA, 3RD PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 079. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) BY NAME SARITHA. S (REG. UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT 1959) …PETITIONER (BY SMT. RADHIKA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. DINESH SHETTY K S/O. SADASHIVA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.7/10, A/4, CHABRIA LAYOUT, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. S. NANJAPPA S/O. SIDDALINGAIAH SHETTY, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34258 WP No. 20567 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, 3. SRI. RATHNAPUNAM, D/O NANJAPPA.S. AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.228, 1ST MAIN, 1ST STAGE, 5TH PHASE, 60 FEET ROAD, SHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALLING FOR RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE CASE, THIS HONBLE HIGH COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO (A) QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.07.2025 PASSED IN C.C.NO.01/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAMANAGAR, UNDER ANNEXURE-D, BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Notice to the respondents is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 2. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34258 WP No. 20567 of 2026 3. What is essentially being challenged is the order passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Ramanagar, in C.C.No.01/2025 on 31.07.2025. The petitioner has a statutory remedy of challenging the same before the State Consumer Redressal Commission. 4. Reserving such liberty, the petitioner stands disposed. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28