1 CGHC010333332025 2026:CGHC:30654 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1237 of 2025 Shivkumar Sahu S/o Shri Manbodh Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o House No. 4/ 1, Musalman Para, Village And Gram Panchayat Salfa, Tehsil Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner/Applicant versus Manish Sahu Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate For Respondent : Present in person along with Mr. DR Minj, Dy. Advocate General (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 20.07.2026 1. Heard. 2. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of Order dated 27.02.2025 passed in WPC No.5522/2024 (Annexure-C/1). 3. At the outset, respondent, who is present in person, submits that though vide supplementary award dated 22.02.2021, an amount of Rs.53,072/- was awarded as additional compensation to the petitioner/ applicant, but, the National Highway Authority of India raised an objection on BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.07.21 10:54:14 +0530 2 the ground that that the petitioner has constructed a tiled roof house (khappraposh makan) on Government land, therefore, he is not entitled to get solatium on the said amount, rather he is only entitled to get value of katcha tiled house i.e. Rs.26,536/-. It is further submitted that on account of above, NHAI has only deposited an amount of Rs.26,536/- in respect of supplementary award dated 22.02.2021. The respondent further submits that he is still ready to pay the aforesaid amount of compensation i.e. Rs.26,536/- deposited by the NHAI to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, the respondent is directed to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs. Rs.26,536/- to the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to make present the petitioner before the respondent on 29th July, 2026. In the eventuality of the appearance of the petitioner, the respondent is directed to pay the amount of compensation to him after following the due process. 6. Accordingly, the rule issued is discharged and contempt proceeding is dropped. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini