MOHAMMAD ASLAM SHEIKH v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (REVENUE)
LPA/202/2026 · 2026-09-01
A, Mohd Yousuf Wani
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2770 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2770 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.45 SUPP CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR LPA 202/2026 MOHAMMAD ASLAM SHEIKH …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Parvaiz Lone, Advocate Vs.
UT OF J&K AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2026
1. This is appeal under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent filed by the appellant to assail the order dated 29th July, 2026, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court [“the writ Court”] in WP(C) No. 1778/2026, titled “Mohammad Aslam Sheikh Vs. UT of J&K and others”, whereby the writ Court has disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondent No. 4 to consider and act upon the recommendations as well as the Eviction Notice dated 09.07.2024, issued by the competent authority, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date a copy of the order is served upon him.
2. The impugned order has been challenged by the appellant on the ground that the same has been passed by the writ Court on the very first motion hearing day without putting him on notice. He submits that, had he been put on notice, he would Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 02.09.2026 17:19
have brought to the notice of the learned writ Court that there is a suit between the appellant and the Union Territory pending disposal before the court of the learned Munsiff Boniyar.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the material on record, we are of the considered opinion that this appeal can be disposed of by providing that, while initiating any action of eviction against the appellant herein in terms of the impugned judgment dated 29th July, 2026, the respondent No. 4 shall not only hear the appellant but shall also take into consideration the pendency of the civil suit between the appellant and the Union Territory.
4. With the aforesaid modification, this appeal is, accordingly,
disposed of.
(Mohd Yousuf Wani) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge
Chief Justice (Acting)
SRINAGAR: 01.09.2026
“ARIF”
Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 02.09.2026 17:19