APHC010704952014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1980/2014 Between: 1. DR.C.R.SURENDRANATH S/O C.RAMADAS,, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC: LECTURER, RIO H.NO.14-82, BEHIND COURT, PARK STREET, PAKALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT- 517 112. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS T T D, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI; CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEVASTHANAM EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. SRI VENKATESWARA ARTS COLLEGE, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL, BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of 2 the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 in not renewing the appointment of the Petitioner as contract lecturer (Dairy Science) on par with the other contract lecturers for the academic year 2013-14 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to renew the appointment of the Petitioner as lecturer (Dairy Science) to work at the 4th respondent college from the academic year 2013-14 onwards and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 2400 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to forthwith renew the appointment of the Petitioner as contract lecturer (Dairy Science) to work at the 4th respondent college from the academic year 2013-14 onwards, pending final disposal of the main writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V,R.N PRASHANTH SC FOR TTD 2. . The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed away and the grievance of the petitioner challenging the action of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in not renewing the appointment of the petitioner as contract lecturer (Dairy Science) would not survive for further adjudication on merits. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 21.01.2026 PNS