APHC010703472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 521/2026 Between: 1. TADEPALLI RAO VEERABHADRA ALIAS TADEPALLI RAO V,, S/ O, TADEPALLI VENKATESWARA RAO (LATE), AGED 65 YEARS. RESIDING AT 26820, LOVE OAK, CT, CALABASAS, LOS ANGELS, CALIFORNIA, 91301, USA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 532 228 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICEDGP, DGP OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522 503 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, O/O THE POLICE COMMISSIONARATE, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more in the nature of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents not to considered the petitioner Representation dated 01-06-2025 and 02- 12-2025 for providing Police protection is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and also consequently direct the Respondents not registered if any false crime against the petitioner and further consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to provide the Police Protection while the petitioner will arrive to India for facing trial in Civil Dispute” 2 2. Heard Sri K.Simhachalam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S. No.30 of 2024, which was filed for partition, and that there is a life threat to the petitioner from the respondents. He would further submit that the petitioner has submitted a representation to the police and seeks a direction of this Court to consider the said representation. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the petitioner has not even made the Station House Officer a party to the present matter. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent No.3 is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate decision over the matter according to governing Rules and Law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.01.2026 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.521 of 2026 Dt.07.01.2026 Asr