- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34086 WP No. 23934 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 23934 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SIDDARAJU M., S/O LATE MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO - 5, (149/5), HULLALU VILLAGE, HULLALU MAIN ROAD, MANGANAHALLI CROSS, BENGALURU -560 056 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S NAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. G. KUMARA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE GUNDAPPA, R/A NO.149/4, ULLALA VILLAGE MAIN ROAD, MANGANAHALLI CROSS, BANGALORE- 560 056 2. SRI. B. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O SRI.PATEL BASAVARAJAIAH, R/A NO.69, 22ND CROSS, MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 040 3. SRI. SANJEEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34086 WP No. 23934 of 2025 FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF, 4. SRI. ANIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF 5. SRI. PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF, RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 5 ARE R/A ULLAL VILLAGE, YESHWANTPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 6. SRI. SHIVARAJ AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE SRINIVAS, R/A NO.24, 5TH CROSS, ITI EXTENSION, KATRIGUPPE MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 085 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT ORDERS BY GRANTING THE FOLLOWING RELIEF. ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 03/07/2025 AND 19.07.2025 PASSED ON LA NO.3 IN 0.5 NO 465/2011 THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, JUNIOR DIVISION, AT BENGALURU, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AS PER ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34086 WP No. 23934 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Memo is filed stating that writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 03.07.2025 passed on I.A.No.3 filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC and the plaint itself is returned to the respondents based on the memo filed by the respondent. Hence, the Petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.As., in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2