( IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAW'"^ if ? ar X *si .f.f il > THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13318 OF 2025 ^;7 "S Between: Boya Chiranjeevi, R/o D.No. 7-126, Peddammagudi Veedhi, Hindupuramu road, Kalyandurgam, Ananthapuramu district ... Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Amaravathi ...Respondent Petition under Section 482 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, tile High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/ Accused Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 01 of 2025 Gummagatta Police Station, Ananthapuramu district. on on the file The Petition coming on for bearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s AYESHA AZMA S Advocate for the Petitioner PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the Court made the following and of j f APHC010700822025 « IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13318/2025 [3396] Between: BOYA CHIRANJEEVI, R/O D.NO. 7-126, PEDDAMMAGUDI VEEDHI, HINDUPURAMU ROAD, KALYANDURGAM, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS pJbLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURJ OF AP, AMARAVATI AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.AYESHAAZMAS Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.01 of 2025 on the file of Gummagatta Police Station, Anantapuramu District, which is registered !or the offence under Section 105 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’). Heard Ms.S.Ayesha Azma, learned counsel for the Petitioner / Accused 2. and Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State / Respondent. 3- Learned counsel for the Petitioner an Registered Medical Practioner attract the alleged offence. would submit that thePetitioner herein iIS and the allegations levelled against him do not It is further submitted that wherein, the Petitioner is implicated, apart from in the present crime, stating that the Petitioner administered the injection to the wife of the De facto counsel would submit that the Petitioner complainant. Learned herein approached the Police and has furnished the relevant information regarding the alleged incident. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that they are in the may take some time to collect the process of investigation and it material to decide the genuiiness of the version of the Petitioner. 5. .Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material issue arises when the Petitioner, who is a Registered on record, the genisis of the i Medical Practioner advised complainant through his escaled and she from one hospital to the other, to administer a drug to the wife of the De assisted over phone. Subsequenity was shifted to a higher forum facto the problem was and after four days of shifting her she lost her breath. Prima facie this may be a case of medical negligence. Petitioner in the alleged offence, si far, the i This is not the stage to decide the culpability of the since the investigation is not yet completed. So investigating officer could not take the opinion of the Medical Board, is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the In that view, this Court i Petitioner. 6- Accordingly, the Criminal Petition i IS allowed granting anticipatory bail to the Petitioner / Accused the following conditions; on (i) The Petitioner / Accused shall Court, within appear before the concerned Magistrate one week from today and shall furnish personal bond for i 3 Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each, to the satisfaction of concerned jurisdictional Court; The Petitioner shall appear before the concerned Station House Officer once in a week i.e., on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m., titi 5.00 p.m., till filing of the charge sheet. The Petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and appear before the Police as and when directed to furnish any information. (ii) (iii) Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- B.PRASAD RAO deputy REG^^^^ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY To. 1. The Station House Officer, Gummagatta Police Station. Ananthapuramu District j 2. One CC to M/s AYESHA AZMA S Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCS to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. One spare copy I PSR HIGH COURT DR.VJP,J DATED: 12/02/2026 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.13318of 2025 ALLOWED 7 o -gj 13 ftB 2® //C._> CO Jcr V