Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27670 (JHR)

MUJAHID ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8223/2026 · 2026-09-29

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:29261 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8223 of 2026 Mujahid Ansari, aged about 21 years, S/O - Kalim Ansari, R/O - Mattar, P.O +P.S. - Karmatar, District - Jamtara. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 05/29.09.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026 in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.28 of 2026 registered under sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 & Sections 66(B), 66(C) and 66(D) of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that one mobile and two SIMs are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, which are standing in the name of the family members of the petitioner. He submits that no victim has been identified and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that charge sheet has already been filed and no crime link has been found. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026. 5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 6. No counter affidavit has been filed in terms of the last order, but the case diary is available for consideration. 7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to 2026:JHHC:29261 2 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.28 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:29.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026