Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27668 (CAL)

BIMAL KUMAR SAMANTA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/258/2024 · 2026-07-13

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.07.2026 Court No.25 M/L No.2 S. Gayen In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 258 of 2024 Bimal Kumar Samanta Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal Ms. Suvasree Ghose …for the Petitioner Ms. Rashmi Bothra Ms. Oisani Mukherjee …for the State Mr. Raj Kr. Saini …for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 12 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are some technical defects in the writ petition and she has not made necessary parties in the present writ application and prays for withdrawal of the present writ application with the liberty to file afresh. 2. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, WPA 258 of 2024 is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file afresh. 3. The written instruction submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner be kept with the record. (Krishna Rao, J.)