APHC010702632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 36346/2025 Between: 1. B LEELAVATHI, W/O. SEKAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. 148, SAKTHIVEL NAGAR, 24TH STREET, PUZHAL, PUZHAL, TIRUVALLUR, TAMIL NADU - 600066 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR . 3. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT O/O DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR 4. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NAGARI REVENUE DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PALASAMUDRAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.- ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly the Respondent No. 5, in interfering with the petitioners 2 peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.40 cents in Sy. No. 108/1 of Krishnajammapuram village, Palasamudram Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the principles of natural justice besides being violative of articles 14, 21 and 300(A) of the constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents, more particularly the Respondent No. 5, not to interefere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property situated in an extent of Ac. 1.40 cents in Sy. No. 108/1 of Krishnajammapuram village, Palasamudram Mandal, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondent No. 5 to not to interfere into the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.40 cents in Sy. No. 108/1 of Krishnajammapuram village, Palasamudram Mandal, Chittoor District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: <to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly the Respondent No. 5, in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.40 cents in Sy.No.108/1 of Krishnajammapuram village, Palasamudram Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the principles of natural justice besides being violative of articles 14, 21 and 300(A) of the constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents, more particularly the Respondent No. 5, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property situated in an extent of Ac.1.40 cents in Sy.No. 108/1 of Krishnajammapuram village, Palasamudram Mandal, Chittoor District and pass….= 2. Heard Sri P.Jagadish Chandra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents, on written instructions dated 02.01.2026, furnished by the Tahsildar i.e. respondent no.5, submitted that the revenue officials are not entering in the subject land and the petitioner is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land and the petitioner approached the Court fearing that the land given to the petitioner would be cancelled. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4 5. Considering the said submissions, the respondents are directed not to evict and dispossess the petitioner from the subject property without following due process of law. 6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 07.01.2026 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.36346 OF 2025 07.01.2026 RD