IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 149 CRM-M-36344-2026 Date of decision : 08.07.2026 DARSHNA RANI AND ANOTHER ...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Aneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that FIR has been lodged for the offences which are compoundable, and, therefore, the petitioners would like to approach the Investigating Officer/the learned trial Court for the compounding of offence. However, he wants the liberty to approach this Court again if the compromise is not appreciated by the Investigating Officer or the learned trial Court. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 08.07.2026 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2026.07.09 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document