APHC010698512025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 36061/2025 Between: 1. KOTA CHINNARI, W/O LATE NATHANIEL @ NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC COMPUTER OPERATOR, R/O HNO 3-256, NERELLAMMA COLONY, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY TO GOVT., HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT A P - C 3. ADDL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT, 4. DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AR, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT A P- 5. G SRINIVASULU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER. AGED MAJOR, OCC DISPATCH CLERK, SP OFFICE, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT, 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in calling the petitioner on 18.12.2025 and directing her to submit explanation to the complaint of the 5th respondent by 21.12.2025, without furnishing a copy of the said complaint as illegal, irregular, irrational, biased and arbitrary and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to proceed with enquiry without furnishing the copy of the complaint of the 5th respondent against the petitoner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to proceed with enquiry without furnishing the copy of the complaint of the 5th respondent against the petitoner, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.36061 of 2025 O R DE R: The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.4 in called the Petitioner on 18.12.2025 and seeking for explanation to the complaint of the Respondent No.5 by 21.12.2025, without furnishing a copy of the said complaint, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The facts in brief are as follows: - Petitioner was appointed as a Computer Operator in Home-Guard Unit of Respondent No.2 and was working to the best of her ability. Respondent No.5 lodged a complaint against the Petitioner and Respondent No.4 asked the Petitioner to submit her explanation with regard to complaint lodged by Respondent No.5 by 21.12.2025, without furnishing any copies to her. Hence, the present writ petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, calling the Petitioner without any show-cause notice and seeking for explanation is not contemplated under the law. 4 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader furnished the copy of complaint to the Petitioner. 5. As the copy of the complaint is furnished, the grievance of the Petitioner is redressed. The writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 02.01.2026 chs 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 97 WRIT PETITION NO: 36061/2025 Dt. 02.01.2026 chs