- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32899 WP No. 34083 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.34083 OF 2025 (SCST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PUTTANJANEYA G.R. S/O LATE RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT GANGADHARANAPALYA KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PUNITH C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU-572 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MADHUGIRI SUB DIVISION TUMAKURU-572 132. 4. THE THASILDAR SIRA TALUK TUMAKURU-572 132. Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32899 WP No. 34083 of 2025 5. SRI. ANANDAPPA S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT SHIDLEKONA VILLAGE GOPALADEVARAHALLI POST BUKKAPATTANA HOBLI SIRA TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 137. ]]] …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA N., AGA., FOR R.1 TO R.4; SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R.5.) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED NIL IN 26 PTCL/31/2025-2026 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ANNEXURE-G AND TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-H FILED UNDER SECTION 55 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32899 WP No. 34083 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the writ petition is filed challenging non-consideration of interim prayer made by the petitioner before respondent no.2-Deputy Commissioner. It is now submitted that, the appeal before respondent no.2 itself has been disposed of and the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and challenge the final order. He has filed a memo dated 30.06.2026 in this regard. 2. The memo is taken on record. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. It is needless to state, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the final order passed by respondent no.2, he is always at liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61