1 CGHC010267212026 2026:CGHC:30335 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3720 of 2026 1 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Through Authorised Officer Kamlesh Kundan, S/o Dinesh Lal Das, Aged About 48 Years, Regional Office Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - District Magistrate- Cum- Collector Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Tehsildar Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Jitendra Dewangan S/o Vishram Dewangan R/o House No. 347, Ayodhya Nagar, New Changorabhantha, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from CIS Periphery.) For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate. For State : Mr. Anway Tiwari, P.L. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/07/2026 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition for following reliefs:- Digitally signed by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU 2 “10.1 That, the records pertaining to the revenue case of the petitioner, may be kindly called for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authority to decide the representations preferred by the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to take further steps as per section 14 of the Act of 2002, in the interest of justice. 10.4 That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that an order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) was passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, however, no consequential action has been taken pursuant thereto. It is further submitted that respondent No. 4 has challenged the said order before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur (M.P.), but no interim order is stated to have been passed by the Tribunal or communicated to the petitioner-Bank. In the absence of any such order, the petitioner has preferred the present petition seeking a direction to the competent authorities to give effect to the order dated 19.05.2025 and take consequential action in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 3. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, deems it appropriate to direct the concerned Revenue Authorities to take consequential action pursuant to the order passed under relevant 3 Sections of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With this observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju