Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27646 (CAL)

HAIDAR KHAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/15193/2026 · 2026-07-13

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27 1133..0077..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 15193 of 2026 Haider Khan Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Daisy Basu Mr. Jayanta Mukherjee …for the petitioner Ms. Tripti Mukherjee Mr. Mansaram Mondal …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioner submits that premises where petitioner is staying requires immediate repairing due to its dilapidated condition. Prayer is made in this writ petition for directing the concerned police authorities to take steps which will facilitate the petitioner to repair the premises in question and if obstruction is made by any interested parties they shall be prevented. 3. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. During course of hearing nothing is shown before this Court that concerned authority of Kolkata Municipal Corporation permitted the 2 petitioner to repair the premises. Petitioner is required to approach the appropriate authority for repairing the premises. Police authority is not the authority to decide the right of the petitioner to repair the premises in question. 5. Hence, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. 6. Writ petition stands dismissed. 7. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority/forum in pursuit of remedy. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)