Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27644 (JHR)

SUSHIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND CO-OPERATIVE

C.Rev./68/2026 · 2026-09-18

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:28395 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 68 of 2026 Sushil Kumar, aged about 62 years, S/o Krishna Chandra Prasad, R/o- 302, Green Field Imperia, Sita Compound, Overbridge, P.Ο. & P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand ... Petitioner Versus 1. 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Co-operative, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 2. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jharkhand, having his office at Engineers' Hostel, HEC Colony, Dhurwa, Ρ.Ο. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District - Ranchi. 3. Jharkhand State Co-operative Bank Ltd., through its Chief Executive Officer, having its office at Bazar Samiti Building. Itki Road, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi. 4. The Administrator, Jharkhand State Co-operative Bank Ltd., having its office at Bazar Samiti, Itki Road, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District - Ranchi. ..Respondents -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sriwastava, Advocate For the Resp.-Bank : Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advocate -- 02/18.09.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants review of the order dated 10.01.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3576 of 2018, whereby the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 76,085/- to the competent authority within a period of 2 months because admittedly the petitioner has withdrawn Rs. 76,085/-. 2. This part in paragraph-5 of the order is a categorical finding of the writ court and it has not been said that there is any typographical error; rather the petitioner prays that he may be exempted from depositing the said 2026:JHHC:28395 2 amount of Rs. 76,085/- on the basis of permission made by the Deputy Commissioner. 3. In this regard, it is clarified only to the extent that so far as this order is concerned, the review is not permissible in view of the fact that the finding given in para-5 is on the basis of the documents available at the time of final order. However, if the Deputy Commissioner so feels appropriate; he may exempt the petitioner from depositing Rs. 76,085/-. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant review application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 18th September, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 29/09/2026