Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27643 (ORI)

SHIV KUMAR SAHOO v. ODISHA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CUTTACK

WP(C)/7292/2026 · 2026-07-23

Murahari Sri Raman

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.7292 of 2026 Shiv Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. Sourav Das, Advocate -versus- Odisha Public Service Commission and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. Arnav Behera, Advocate CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No. ORDER 23.07.2026 01. 1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition invoking provisions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer(s):- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit the present writ application/ petition, issue notice to the opposite parties and after hearing both the parties be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ/writs and quash the Opposite Party No.02’s letter & RTI Reply dtd.12.02.2026 and in-consequence thereof, direct the Opposite Party No.02 to submit the information as well as the documents of the desired information as per the Petitioner’s RTI Application on dtd.23.11.2022; And may pass any other appropriate writ/writs and order/orders which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, by way of filing a memo in Court today, submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition. The said memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (M.S. Raman) Judge Laxmikant Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER