Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27641 (CHH)

IETEKA MRIDHA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3663/2026 · 2026-07-16

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010265632026 2026:CGHC:30430 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3663 of 2026 1 - Ieteka Mridha W/o Ajay Mridha Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 21, Ward No. 06, Post- Ajabnagar, Village Ravindranagar, Raghavpuri, District - Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, Advocate For State :- Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. For Respondent-Municipal Corporation :- Mr. Anadi Sharma, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 17.07.2026 VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had approached this Court seeking appropriate directions for consideration of the grievance relating to admission of their wards in the respective private schools. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent instruction dated 15.07.2026 issued by the competent authority providing for the third round of counselling for admission of students in private schools, the petitioner may be permitted to participate in the said counselling process by submitting the requisite application within the prescribed time. 2. Learned State counsel appearing for the respondents submits that an instruction dated 15.07.2026 has already been issued to all the District Education Officers, whereby it has been directed to conduct the third round of counselling for admission of students in private schools. It is further submitted that, pursuant to the said instruction, applications for the third counselling are required to be submitted online from 22.07.2026 to 05.08.2026 for seeking admission in the respective private schools. Learned State counsel further submits that, in view of the aforesaid instruction dated 15.07.2026 issued by the competent authority, the grievance raised by the petitioner stands redressed. It is submitted that the petitioner may submit a suitable application pursuant to the said instruction and complete the requisite online process before the concerned authorities for admission of their wards in the respective private schools. 3 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the instruction dated 15.07.2026 issued by the competent authority for conducting the third round of counselling for admission of students in private schools, this Court finds that the grievance raised by the petitioner has been duly addressed by the respondents. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to submit an appropriate application in terms of the instruction dated 15.07.2026 and complete the online application process before the concerned authorities within the prescribed period, i.e., from 22.07.2026 to 05.08.2026. The concerned authorities shall consider the application of the petitioner in accordance with the applicable rules, instructions and law and take an appropriate decision expeditiously. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. No order as to costs. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha