AKSAR BK AKCHAR BK @ AKCHHAR ALI BK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/893/2026 · 2026-07-13
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27640 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27640 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.07.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.17
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 893 of 2026
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Nakashipara Police Station Case No. 257 of 2021 dated 06.06.2021 under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act (G.R. Case No. 1240 of 2021). And
In Re : Aksar Bk Akchar Bk @ Akchhar Ali Bk
... Petitioner. Mr. Debabrata Roy, Mrs. Karabi Roy, Ms. Sarbani Mukhopadhyay
... For the Petitioner. Mr. Gurudas Mitra, Mr. Utsav Dutta
... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 06.06.2021 and is in custody for 5 years 1 month. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail on the grounds that it is the petitioner who had role in respect of the alleged offences which have been committed and firearms were recovered at the leading statement of the present accused. There were earlier directions passed by the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court on 12.06.2024 and 27.03.2025. So far as the latter order is concerned, there were directions to conclude the trial within a reasonable period of time. So far as the earlier rejection is concerned, one year time period was granted to the State. 2 Report submitted on behalf of the State reflects that date has been fixed for evidence of CSW-15 and CSW-16. Report also reflects that till date, 9 witnesses have been examined out of the cited 27 witnesses in the charge-sheet. Having considered the time period for which the petitioner is detained in custody (i.e. for 5 year 1 month) and the report of the State do not reflect that any antecedent is there of the present petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Aksar Bk Akchar Bk @ Akchhar Ali Bk shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagar, Nadia.
If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, the petitioner, for the next six months, shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge/Inspector-in-Charge, Nakashipara Police Station. It would be the discretion of the learned Trial Court either to waive such condition or extend such condition for ensuring the proper conduct of the present petitioner. Memo of Evidence and report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 893 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. 3 All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)