Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19231 WP No. 16199 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 16199 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI. SYED MOHAMMED UMAIR AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, S/O SYED MASOOD, R/AT FLAT NO.1102, EMBASSY OASIS NO.46/1, PROVIMADE ROAD, SHIVANCHETTY GARDEN, BENGALURU - 560 042. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARASIMHA PRASAD S.D, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS, W/O NARAYANASHETTY, D/O DASAPPA SHETTY, R/AT MUTTUGADAHALLI VILLAGE, KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 563 138. 2. SRI. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, S/O THAMMANNA SHETTY, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19231 WP No. 16199 of 2022
3. SRI. DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALA SHETTY,
4. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALA SHETTY,
5. SRI. VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALA SHETTY,
6. SMT. MANJULA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O LATE SRINIVASA,
7. SMT. SHASHIKALA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O SATISH, D/O.LATE SRINIVASA,
8. SMT. RATHNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O SURESH, D/O LATE SRINIVASA,
9. SRI. VINAY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O.LATE SRINIVASA, RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 9 ARE R/AT VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPLE ROAD, KOTE, DEVANAHALLI TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19231 WP No. 16199 of 2022
10. SMT. NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O RAMANJINAPPA, D/O LATE KITTAMAM W/O LATE VENKTAPPA,
11. SRI. NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O.LATE KITTAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA,
12. SRI. NATASHEKARA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE KITTAMMA W/O LATE VENKTAPPA,
13. SMT. SUSHEELA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O VENKATESH, D/O LATE KITTAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA RESPONDENT NOS, 10 TO 13 ARE R/AT FORT, DEVANAHALLI TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 14. SMT. SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O SURYAPRAKASH, D/O RANGAPPA, R/AT KAMTI STREET, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALALPURA DISTRICT - 563 128. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19231 WP No. 16199 of 2022
15. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, W/O.GURAPPA, D/O.LATE GOPALA SHETTY, R/AT THANDRAMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 101. 16. SRI. SYED SULEMAN AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, S/O.SYED OSMAN, R/AT NO.46, PROMENDE ROAD, SHIVANCHETTY GARDEN, BENGALURU - 560 042. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.
GNANA MURTHY C.,ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTIUTTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF DISMISSAL DTD.5.4.2022 ON INTERIM APPLICATION DTD,.16.2.2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN UNDER ORDER XXII RULE 29 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT DEVANAHALLI AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE SAME (VIDE ANNEXURE-A HEREIN) AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19231 WP No. 16199 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has rendered infructuous. The memo reads as under;
"The petitioner has challenged the order passed in F.D.P.No.25/2014 dated 5-4-2022 by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Devanahalli. The contesting Respondent in the above petition had challenged the Preliminary Decree before this Hon'ble Court by filing an appeal in RFA No.1331/2015 and this Hon'ble Court allowed the said appeal and the proceeding in final decree was terminated. In this view of the matter, the above writ petition has become infructuous and hence, the petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to DISMISS THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION as having become infructuous in the interest of justice and equity."
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19231 WP No. 16199 of 2022
2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31