( 2026:JHHC:29124 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9056 of 2026 ------ Krishna Mukherjee, aged about 46 years, daughter of Chandramohan Ray, resident of Nuni, Bardhaman, P.O. & P.S.- Asansol, District-Bardhaman, West Bengal. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 247 of 2026 instituted under Section 103(1) & 61(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused Ankit Raj @ Ankit Kumar has committed murder of Akshat Kumar who was admitted in a drug de-addiction centre of which Abirbhab Mukherjee, is the Manager. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is a female and admittedly she was not present at the place of occurrence at the time of occurrence and only because she is the mother of the Abirbhab Mukherjee, she has been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that though, it has not been mentioned in the bail application, but the name of the husband of the petitioner is Animesh Mukherjee. It is also submitted that the main allegation of murder is against Ankit Raj @ Ankit Kumar and Abirbhab Mukherjee. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph-14 of the bail application and she has been in jail custody since 27.08.2026, as mentioned in para-15 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Deoghar in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 247 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that she will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28/09/2026 Abhiraj/