Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27635 (PNJ)

AMIT KHATRI @ SETHI v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/32393/2026 · 2026-07-08

Shalini Singh Nagpal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 CRM-M-32393-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.07.2026 AMIT KHATRI ALIAS SETHI PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Atull Dhankhar, Advocate for Mr. Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kshitij Bharti, AAG Haryana. *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) 1. Learned state counsel submits that petitioner has been arrested and the petition has become infructuous. This factual position is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Dismissed, having become infructuous. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 08.07.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.09 15:22 I agree to specified portions of this document