IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47530 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2026 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Vishal Yadav S/O Dadan Yadav R/O Village- Jalalpur, P.S- Daraundha, District- Siwan. 2. Rohit Yadav S/O Chandrika Yadav R/O Bareja Ke Tola, P.S- Daudpur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. 3. Hirdyanand Yadav S/O Sudarshan Yadav R/O Village- Bareja Ke Tola, P.S.- Daudpur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 16-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 186 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a)of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 438.960 liters liquor was recovered from two different cars and petitioners were arrested on spot. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47530 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioners are neither owner nor driver of the car and they got no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioners are in custody since 16.06.2026. The petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have got two criminal antecedents while petitioner No.3 has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 186 of 2026. sukriti/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T