CRM-M-35180-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 172 CRM-M-35180-2026 Decided on : 06.07.2026 M/s Ruby Powertech and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Brijesh Singh Ladwal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG Haryana SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of complaint dated 28.05.2019, summoning order dated 10.07.2019 and notice of accusation dated 21.09.2021 alongwith all consequential proceedings in complaint case filed against the petitioner under Section 138/142 of NI Act, 1881 vide Complaint Case No. NACT/24077/2019 titled as Ruby Sharma vs. M/s Ruby Powertech and another pending in the Court of JMFC, Gurugram, Haryana. 2. For challenging the complaint as well as summoning order, which pertains to the year 2019, notice of acquisition are also dated 29.01.2021, quashing petition has been filed by the petitioners (summoned accused) after a period of about 07 years, that too on merits. Meaning thereby petitioners have been appearing and facing the proceedings for these many years before the trial Court. There was a judgment in the year 2025 passed by the Apex Court titled as REENA 2026.07.08 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-35180-2026 Kaveri Plastics vs. Mah doom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul, decided on 19.09.2025 and petitioners have filed the instant petition before this Court at such a belated stage. 3. The plea is not entertained, however, trial Court is directed to look into the submissions addressed by the petitioners based upon Kaveri Plastics case (supra) at relevant stage/final stage and proceedings in the trial be expedited. 4. The petition is disposed of accordingly. 06.07.2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) reena JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO REENA 2026.07.08 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh