Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2762 (ALL)

SHYAM KISHOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6727/2026 · 2026-05-05

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6727 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Hardik Kishore, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. In present writ petition, petitioner is not able to show that he was appointed on Class-IV post after due selection process. Even there is no appointment letter on record, therefore, only on basis that he has worked as Class-IV employee or some experience certificate was issued, it cannot be construed that he is a regular appointee of concerned Committee of Management. 3. Therefore, there is no employer-employee relationship between petitioner and Committee of Management. It is up to respondents - Management to take services of petitioner or not, hence, relief sought in present writ petition cannot be granted. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. May 6, 2026 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hardik Kishore, Vijayendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Shyam Kishor .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad