MS JRD HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MS GURGAON INFOSPACE LIMITED AND ANOTHER
ARB/306/2026 · 2026-07-06
Lapita Banerji
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27618 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27618 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ARB-306-2026 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s JRD Holdings Private M/s Gurgaon Infospace Limited and another CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate,
for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Advocate for Mr. Vipul Joshi, Advocate,
for the respondents. LAPITA BANERJI
Memo of appearance of respondents No.1 and 2 is taken on record. 2. This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, Arbitrator under Clause 12.11 (Annexure P-
3. Both the parties are represented in Court today. 4. By consent of the parties (Former Judge of the Supreme Court Niketan, New Delhi mobile No. 9 dispute betwee requirements. 5. Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the Learned Arbitrator. 2026 (O&M) Sr. No. 113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB Date of Decision
M/s JRD Holdings Private Limited
Versus M/s Gurgaon Infospace Limited and another HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Advocate for Mr. Vipul Joshi, Advocate, for the respondents. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral)
Memo of appearance filed by the counsel appearing of respondents No.1 and 2 is taken on record. This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the 1996 Act’) for appointment of Arbitrator under Clause 12.11 of the Service Ag 1 ) Both the parties are represented in Court today. By consent of the parties, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi udge of the Supreme Court of India Niketan, New Delhi-110021 and House No. 69, Sector 10 mobile No. 9210906290 is appointed as Arbitrator to adjudicate dispute between the parties, subject to compliance of requirements. Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the Learned Arbitrator. Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARB-306-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.07.2026
…Petitioner
…Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate, filed by the counsel appearing on behalf
This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & the 1996 Act’) for appointment of a sole Service Agreement dated 29.11.2024 Both the parties are represented in Court today. Hon’ble Mr.
Justice Ajay Rastogi of India) A-6, First Floor, Anand 110021 and House No. 69, Sector 10-A, Chandigarh is appointed as Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the n the parties, subject to compliance of the statutory Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the Learned Arbitrator. VANDANA 2026.07.08 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
ARB-306-2026 (O&M)
6. Needless to mention that all the questions arising betwee parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned Arbitrator. 7. A request letter along with a copy of this order be sent to Hon’ble Mr. India). 8. With the directions aforesaid
9. Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. July 06, 2026 Vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 2026 (O&M) Needless to mention that all the questions arising betwee parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned A request letter along with a copy of this order be sent to Justice Ajay Rastogi (Former Judge of Supreme Court of With the directions aforesaid ARB Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI)
JUDGE
6 speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned A request letter along with a copy of this order be sent to Former Judge of Supreme Court of ARB-306-2026 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE
VANDANA 2026.07.08 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document