Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27616 (AP)

Buradapati Sudha v. Meesala Rama Rao

CRP/3742/2025 · 2026-01-01

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010700642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3742/2025 Between: 1. BURADAPATI SUDHA, , W/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNA @ KRISHNA AGED- 57 YEARS, R/O.GEDDA VEEDHI, RING ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. MEESALA RAMA RAO, , S/O.LAKSHMAU NAIDU, AGED 70 YEAR, R/O.AMBATI SATRAM JUNCTION CHIKKALAVEEDHI, VIZIANAGARAM. 2. BURADAPATI SURENDRA SAGAR, S/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNA @ KRISHNA AGED 26 YEARS, R/O.GEDDA VEEDHI, RING ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 3. BURADAPATI SRILAKSHMI, D/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNA @ KRISHNA, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O.GEDDA VEEDHI, RING ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 4. BURADAPATI SOWJANYA, , D/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNA @ KRISHNA AGED 22 YEARS, R/O.GEDDA VEEDHI, RING ROAD. VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DSITRICT (R2 TO R4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES IN THIS CRP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be 2 pleased topleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition and set aside the order dated 13-08-2025 passed n I.A.No.545 of 2025 in O.S.No.283 of 2022 on the file of II Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Vizianagaram IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to order to stay of all further proceedings in OS.No.283 of 2022 on the file of II Additional Civil judge (Junior Division) Court at Vizianagaram pending disposal of the revision petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GOPALA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3742 OF 2025 ORDER: After arguing for some time, Sri Sriman, learned arguing counsel, representing the learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Civil Revision Petition and the same was endorsed on the bundle. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.01.2026 KBN 4 03 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3742 of 2025 Date: 02.01.2026 KBN