Tvl ATHITHIYA RETREADS v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST)
WP/18130/2026 · 2026-06-03
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27613 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27613 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No.18130 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.18130 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.19495, 19496 and 19498 of 2026 Athithiya Retreads Represented by Thammankalipalayam Subramaniam Rameshkumar 2/431, Salem Road Pappinaikanpatti Mudalipatti (PO) Namakkal Tamil Nadu -637 003. GSTID:33AENPR1642A1ZU … Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Namakkal (Rural) Assessment Circle No.67/7, II Floor Integrated Commercial Tax Building Mohanur Road, Namakkal – 637 001. … Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent pertaining to GSTID:33AENPR1642A1ZU/2020-21
order dated 17.02.2025, quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondent to consider the matter afresh after providing opportunity of hearing and dispose the case on merits. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Rajesh For Respondents: Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran Government Counsel (Tax) ***** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No.18130 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 O R D E R An order dated 17.02.2025 is assailed only insofar as it relates to Defect No.2 on the ground that the petitioner’s reply was not taken into consideration.
2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.
3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that the petitioner’s reply is adverted to therein, but no reasons are recorded for concluding that the reply is not accepted. The writ petition, however, has been filed long after the period of limitation for filing a statutory appeal expired.
4. On instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand pertaining to Defect No.2. He has made an endorsement to that effect on the bundle.
5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand relating to Defect No.2, within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is partly set aside insofar as it relates to Defect No.2 and the matter is remanded for reconsideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of compliance of the condition specified above. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, attachment of the bank account of the petitioner shall stand raised. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No.18130 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no
order as to costs. 03.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Speaking order mk To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Namakkal (Rural) Assessment Circle No.67/7, II Floor Integrated Commercial Tax Building Mohanur Road, Namakkal – 637 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No.18130 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. mk W.P.No.18130 of 2026 03.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis