Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2761 (PNJ)

SUNIL v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/20859/2026 · 2026-04-23

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 225 CRM-M-20859-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.04.2026 Sunil ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Siddharth Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravneet Singh Lekhi, AAG Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel states that the charges have not been framed and complainant, in such a case of embezzlement of Rs.2 crores, requires to be examined, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition at this stage. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 23.04.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.04.23 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document