RAHUL UDAY SHRIVASTAV v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WP/2459/2026 · 2026-05-14
Advait M Sethna, Shri Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2761 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2761 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
39-WP-2459-2026 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2459 OF 2026 Rahul Uday Shrivastav ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra And Ors. ...Respondents __________ Ms. Sayli Wani for the Petitioner. Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for State. Mr. R. G. Gujar, PSI, Malad Police Station is present. __________
CORAM :
ADVAIT M. SETHNA & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE :
14 MAY 2026 (VACATION COURT) P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned AGP Ms. Kak on instructions states that the statements of the Petitioner and Detenue has been recorded on 13 May 2026 before Charkop Police Station, Kandivali. It is stated on instructions that both the parties have agreed to reside together and have no complaints against each other.
3. In view thereof, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this Petition. Liberty granted.
4. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[SANDESH D. PATIL, J] [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] Pallavi PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2026.05.14 14:50:07 +0530