Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27609 (CHH)

JITU KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1873/2022 · 2026-07-19

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010325842022 2026:CGHC:30585 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1873 of 2022 1 - Jitu Kumar Singh S/o Shri Nandkishore Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o River View Colony Hatiya Ranchi (Jharkhand) At Present Agrasen Chowk, Saket Enclave P.S. Civil Line Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. Torwa Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Xyz Nil ... Respondent(s) (cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate Ms. Kavita Bansal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 20/07/2026 1. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. S. Baghel, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the Respondent/State and Ms. Kavita Bansal, learned counsel for Respondent SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.07.20 17:44:11 +0530 2 No. 2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and set-aside/ quash the FIR bearing No. 417 of 2022 registered at Police Station Torwa District Bilaspur/ respondent no. 1 for the offence punishable under section 376 of IPC against the present applicant on the ground of marriage done between the applicant/accused and complainant (wife) and probability of non establish of charge against applicant before the trial court in the interest of justice." 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present case, the charge-sheet has been filed. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Cr.M.P. 4. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Interim order granted earlier, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice sagrika