[2026:RJ-JP:16956] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5157/2023 1. Smt. Alka Singh W/o Madhosingh, R/o Village Malipura (Sewar), Tehsil And District Bharatpur. 2. Smt. Seema Singh W/o Rakesh, R/o Opposite Zila Parishad, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur. Both Are Through Power Of Attorney Holder Madhosingh Maderna S/o Shri Prabhulal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Malipura, Presently R/o 157, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ravindra Singh S/o Heera Singh, R/o Village Sahnawali, Tehsil And District Bharatpur. 2. Valvendra Singh S/o Heera Singh, R/o Village Sahnawali, Tehsil And District Bharatpur. 3. Nagar Nigam, Bharatpurh Service, Through Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kumar for Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saurabh Bhandari Mr. J. K. Mookchandani HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 21/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the impugned order passed by the learned Trial Court, whereby the Power of Attorney in question was rejected. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the respondents that crucial subsequent developments have transpired during the pendency of these proceedings, which fundamentally alter the factual matrix of the lis at hand. [2026:RJ-JP:16956] (2 of 2) [CW-5157/2023] 3. It is submitted that the main contesting party, who had executed the disputed Power of Attorney, has unfortunately expired. It is submitted that consequent to the demise of the principal, the said Power of Attorney stands extinguished by operation of law and has been rendered legally meaningless as on date. 4. Learned counsel further submits that in light of the aforesaid change in the circumstances and subsequent developments, the core issue agitated by the petitioners no longer survives, and the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 5. Having heard the submissions advanced and taking note of the undisputed fact regarding the demise of the party, this Court is of the opinion that no substantive grievance remains to be adjudicated by this Court at this juncture. 6. However, taking note of the changed circumstances, the learned Trial Court is explicitly directed to take the aforesaid subsequent developments into consideration and pass an appropriate order afresh, strictly in accordance with the law, if any surviving issue is raised by the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /27