Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:4234 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 1707 of 2026 Decided on : 25.02.2026 Madan Singh …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Shivendra Singh, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation (Annexure P-4) with regard to the issues raised in the petition, but the same has not been decided by the Authority concerned till date.
3. This petition, accordingly, as prayed for, is disposed 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:4234 of with the direction that let representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein, by passing a speaking
order, within a period of 12 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
February 25, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)