- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34934 WP No. 3868 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 3868 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED, NO. 110/37, SOLITAIRE BUILDING, SERVICE ROAD, OUTER RING ROAD, MARATHAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 037 REPRESENTED BY MR. SURESH KUMAR M.B REGISTERED UNDER REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES ACT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUTHU SHIVANI R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY, REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY KARNATAKA, HAVING OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBLIEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. 2. MR. KINSHUK GOEL S/O VIJAY SHANKER GOEL AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 5, CHANAN SINGH PARK, KIRBY PLACE, HOSPITAL ROAD, DELHI CANTT, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34934 WP No. 3868 of 2026 DELHI - 11000 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 29.05.2025 PASSED BY THE R1 AUTHORITY IN CMP /289/2024 PRODUCED AS ANNX-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. K. Rajashekar, learned counsel accepts notice to respondent No.1. 2. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 3. Petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Pass a writ of Certiorari setting aside the Impugned Order dated 29.05.2025 passed by the Respondent No.1 Authority in CMP/289/2024 produced as Annexure-A. b. Pass such other orders/directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34934 WP No. 3868 of 2026 4. What has been challenged is an order passed by the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority in complaint No.CMP/289/2024. The petitioner has a statutory appellate remedy to challenge the said order. 5. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to do so, and providing benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5