M/S KALIA SNACKS, PURI v. MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICE LIMITED, KHURDA
WP(C)/22110/2026 · 2026-07-22
K R Mohapatra, M S Sahoo
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27575 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27575 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) NO.22110 OF 2026
M/s. Kalia Snacks & others
…. Petitioners Ms. Ankita Tripathy, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service Limited, Khurda …. Opp. Party
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
ORDER
Order No. 22.07.2026
01.
1. Petitioner in this writ application prays for the following relief:
“It is therefore prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition, issue notice to the Opposite Party and after hearing the counsels for the parties be pleased to quash the possession Notice dtd.20.06.2026 under Annexure-4.
And or pass any other order/orders, direction/directions allowing the petitioners to pay the said loan amount in equal instalments as deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. In course of hearing, Ms. Tripathy, learned counsel being authorized by Mr. B.C. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to avail appropriate remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Odisha, Cuttack. She also files a memo in support of her prayer signed by Mr. Panda,
learned counsel for the Petitioners. p. 2
3. In view of the memo filed, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with an observation that the Petitioners, if so advised, may avail remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Odisha, Cuttack.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Gs/Jyostna