Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27574 (PNJ)

DHARAMVIR SINGH @ RAJA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/22608/2026 · 2026-07-08

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 Date of decision : 08.07.2026 Dharamvir Singh @Raja ..... Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Punjab ..... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Aman Deep Saini, Advocate for the petitioner(s). ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral) This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner(s) under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.140 dated 29.08.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 109, 118(1), 351(2), 115(2), 190, 191(3) and 125(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [Sections 307, 326, 506, 323, 149, 148 and 337 of Indian Penal Code, 1860] and Section 25 of Arms, Police Station Sri Anandpur Sahib, District Rupnagar. 2. Vide order dated 24.04.2026 the petitioner(s) was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner(s) shall join the investigation. VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.07.09 09:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner(s) that in compliance with order dated 24.04.2026, the petitioner(s) has joined the investigation. 4. The learned State Counsel has submitted on instructions of ASI Tejinder Singh that the petitioner(s) has joined the investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner(s) has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner(s) is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 24.04.2026 whereby the petitioner(s) was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 08.07.2026 Vinod Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.07.09 09:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document