RAJINDER SINGH v. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, JAMMU AND OTHERS
CM(M)/182/2026 · 2026-09-02
Sanjay Dhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2757 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2757 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: CM(M) No. 182/2026
Rajinder Singh
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Zulker Nain Sheikh, Advocate
vs
Divisional Commissioner, Jammu & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 02.09.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently, the present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, though, in the prayer clause, the petitioner has sought a writ of certiorari. He seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file appropriate writ petition. His statement is taken on record.
2. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 02.09.2026 Suraj K. Singh
Serial No. 301