Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27568 (AP)

Shaik Husmuddin v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Secretary

WP/32381/2013 · 2026-03-31

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010697902013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32381/2013 Between: 1. SHAIK HUSMUDDIN, S/O.RIYAZUDDIN, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: SCHOOL ASSISTANT, KHALEEL SIDDIQUI HIGH SCHOOL, N.G.O'S COLONY, NOONEPALLI, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, A.P. HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE CORRESPONDENT, KHALEEL SIDDIQUI HIGH SCHOOL, N.G.O'S COLONY, NOONEPALLI, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders particularly one in the nature of mandamus directing the orders of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.8863/B9/2013, dt.24-07-2013 and the consequential order in R.C.No.11/2013, dt.30-07-2013 and rejection order in R.C.No.11/2013, dt.05-11-2013 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, Violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and Sec.79(3) (b) of Andhra Pradesh Education Act and consequently set aside the same 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 40260 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.8863/B9/2013, dt.24-07- 2013 and R.C.No.11/2013, dt.30-07-2013 of the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION 2. N NIYATHA The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 01.04.2026 SR