APHC010702262013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29618/2013 Between: 1. VEPURI MALLESWARI,, W/O. VEPUR BAPUJI AGE 30 YEARS, OCC: UN EMPLOYEE R/O. SRIRAMAVARAM VILALGE, DENDULURU MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER OF WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM CHAIRPERSON, DW & CDA WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT BIMADOLE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. KOTHAPALLI LAKSHMI BHARATHI, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 2-100 RAMANNAGUDEM, H/O. DEVINENIVARI GUDEM VILLAGE DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in appointing the 6th respondent as Mini Anganwadi Worker of Sriramavaram Village, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, contrary to the procedure established by law, contrary to the guidelines issued vide G.O.Ms. 21 W.D, DW & DW (ICDS) Department dated 24.08.2007 and against to principles of natural justice by setting aside the same and consequentially direct the respondents 3 to 5 to issue appointment orders in favor of the petitioner for the post of Mini Anganwadi Worker of Sriramavaram Village in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 36777 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 5 to appoint the petitioner as Mini Anganwadi Worker of Sriramavaram Village pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Petitioner is challenging the appointment of the 6th respondent as Mini Anganwadi Worker of Sriramavaram Village, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. The petitioner is challenging the appointment of the 6th respondent on the sole ground that the 6th respondent was preferred and appointed even though she does not meet the requirements as per the notification insofar as nativity is concerned. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the 6th respondent is not the resident of Sriramavaram Village. However respondents Nos.1 to 5 have ignored the nativity aspect and appointed the 6th respondent. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 submits that the nativity certificate of the 6th respondent was obtained from the Tahsildar, Denduluru Mandal and the 6th respondent was found to be a native of Sriramavanram Village and she had passed 7th class. The selection committee after the oral interview had selected the 6th respondent for the post of Anganwadi worker. 4. Considering the submissions, it is evident that the respondents have followed the notification and the guidelines thereto and appointed the 6th respondent. On these considerations, this Court is not inclined to interfere. 4 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt:01.04.2026 SR