Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 2756 (RAJ)
ASHISH MANTRI S/O NIRMAL MANTRI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2092/2026 · 2026-04-21
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2756 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2756 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16901] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2092/2026 Ashish Mantri S/o Nirmal Mantri, R/o B 8-53 Intercity Drive In Marg, Near Saal Hospital, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, Gujrat. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Neetu Mantri D/o Shyamlal Gupta, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Flat No. 101, Tower - 1 Aashiyana Green Sikar Road, Near Suncity, Jaipur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Gourav Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 21/04/2026 fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph@vfHk;qDr rFkk ifjoknh@izR;FkhZ dze 2 dk la;qDr :i ls fuosnu gS fd i{kdkjksa ds chp esa jkthukek gks pqdk gS] v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa jkthukek is’k fd;s tkus ij jkthukek ;ksX; vijk/k esa jkthukek rLnhd fd;k tk pqdk gS] rLnhd fd;k tkdj mu vkjksiksa ls nks"keqDr fd;k tk pqdk gS] ysfdu 'ks"k vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 498&, Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa ekeyk jkthukek ;ksX; ugha gksus ls rLnhd ugha fd;k x;k gSA mijksDr rF; U;k;ky; ds le{k j[krs gq;s fuosnu fd;k fd /kkjk 528 ch ,u ,l ,l@/kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq;s jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij yafcr vkijkf/kd fopkj.k dh dk;Zokgh vikLr dh tkdj vfHk;qDr dks nks"keqDr fd;k tkosA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
[2026:RJ-JP:16901] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2092/2026] ;kph@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) tks vkjksi gS] og vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; vijk/k dh Js.kh dk ugha gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; jkthukek gks tkus dh fLFkfr rFkk i{kdkjksa ds chp lkSgknZiw.kZ fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, vc v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fujUrj j[ks tkus dk dksbZ fof/kiw.kZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA vr% ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksdj mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij ntZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA mijksDrkuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk iqfyl Fkkuk&efgyk Fkkuk t;iqj if'pe esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 400@2024 o mlls lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] ¼lk-na- izdj.k½] t;iqj egkuxj&f}rh; ds ;gka yafcr lEiw.kZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkdj ;kph@vfHk;qDr vk'kh"k ea=h iq= fueZy ea=h dks lHkh vkjksiksa ls nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /53